Showing posts with tag general court.
Page: 1 2
General Court consider a question of timing in smartwatch case
Tags: watches, smartwatches, pioneering, scope, invalidation, RCD, general court
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 18/08/2017 @ 14.50
 
General Court consider a question of timing in smartwatch case
Tags: pioneering, scope, registered community design, general court, watch, smartwatch, representations, description
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 18/08/2017 @ 14.39
 
Description Ignored, Ball Canned
Tags: general court, registered community design, rcd, invalidity, cans, packaging, informed user, description, claim
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 20/06/2017 @ 19.40
 
Glass half-empty for Jagermeister
Tags: General Court, RCD, filing date, representations
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 29/03/2017 @ 17.46
 
The writing is on the wall for Beifa ...
Tags: appeal, designs and trade marks, general court, invalidation, OHIM
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 09/08/2013 @ 17.50
 
50 shades of grey - no expertise required
Tags: appeal, copyright, expert, general court, germany, individual character, invalidation, OHIM, prior rights, watches
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 09/08/2013 @ 17.13
 
Imperfectly remembered => perfectly invalidated
Tags: cleaning device, community design, general court, invalidation, shape mark
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 06/06/2013 @ 17.37
 
Stays? Watch this space, say General Court
Tags: appeal, France, general court, invalidation, OHIM, overall impression, stay of proceedings, watches
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 06/06/2013 @ 16.55
 
Summary of radiator case
Tags: appeal, crowded field, density, design freedom, eu, europe, general court, individual character, prior art, radiators, saturation, validity
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 04/12/2012 @ 13.00
 
Inherency – a reduction of protection for IVARS?
Tags: appeal, design freedom, general court, individual character, invalidation, not visible, RCD
Posted By: David Musker
Posted on 10/10/2011 @ 15.26