| Webinar workshop on technical functionality |
| Tags: MARQUES Month, technical functionality, copyright, DOCERAM, Cofemel |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 21/08/2020 @ 11.36 |
| |
| Technical function exclusion – more analysis of DOCERAM v CeramTec |
| Tags: DOCERAM, CeramTec, technical function, Charles Gielen |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 06/11/2018 @ 11.16 |
| |
| AG addresses technical function in DOCERAM opinion |
| Tags: DOCERAM, CJEU, Saugmandsgaard Ře, technical function |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 08/11/2017 @ 11.07 |
| |
| An autonomous test for functional exclusions? Here's a new article |
| Tags: technical function, exclusions, autonomous tests |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 10/12/2015 @ 22.31 |
| |
| Functional designs - the Invalidity Division draw the line, but will it hold? |
| Tags: functionality, Invalidity, OHIM, technical function |
| Posted By: David Musker |
| Posted on 01/11/2011 @ 12.42 |
| |
| Harvesting designs |
| Tags: Invalidity, technical function |
| Posted By: Robert Watson |
| Posted on 21/04/2011 @ 12.26 |
| |
| Technical functionality? Start using the correct fax number! |
| Tags: dyson, landor, sweden, technical function |
| Posted By: Henning Hartwig |
| Posted on 11/11/2010 @ 14.38 |
| |