| Showing posts with tag CTM appeal. |
| Page: 1 |
| How much use of a mark is of "more than mere local significance?" BUD revisited |
| Tags: CTM appeal, use of more than local significance |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 22/01/2013 @ 11.46 |
| FERCREDIT and f@air Credit: would you be confused? |
| Tags: CTM appeal |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 21/01/2013 @ 18.44 |
| No comfort for Dorma as Doorsa mark survives the challenge |
| Tags: CTM appeal, similarity of marks, distinctiveness |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 17/11/2011 @ 23.05 |
| TiMi KINDERJOGHURT figurative sign valid, says ECJ |
| Tags: CTM appeal, similarity of marks |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 25/03/2011 @ 08.21 |
| Peter weathers the peerstorm |
| Tags: CTM appeal, similarity of marks |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 09/07/2010 @ 13.19 |
| Gallecs and Gallo: is a single initial letter enough to support an opposition? |
| Tags: CTM appeal, similarity of marks |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 26/10/2009 @ 12.43 |
| PharmaResearch appeal fails |
| Tags: CTM appeal |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 17/06/2009 @ 11.06 |
| Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? |
| Tags: CTM appeal, restitutio in integrum |
| Posted By: Blog Administrator |
| Posted on 12/05/2009 @ 20.32 |