Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 20 OCTOBER 2020
MARQUES takes part in Madrid Working Group meeting

The MARQUES International Trademark Law and Practice Team, represented by Tove Graulund, Gavin Stenton and Jessica Le Gros, participated in the (postponed) Madrid Working Group meeting last week. The meeting was a hybrid virtual and in-person meeting, which worked well, with live simultaneous translation and contributions both remotely and in the meeting room.

The Madrid Working Group meeting is the forum by which Contracting Parties (generally national trade mark offices) and official observer organisations such as MARQUES work to improve the International Trade Mark system.

There were a number of important topics on the agenda including partial replacement, new means of representation of marks (and the removal of the requirement of graphic representation when filing an IR), and changes to the Regulations to allow more streamlined electronic communications with users and extensions of time limits in force majeure situations.

There were also detailed discussion on the feasibility of introducing Arabic, Chinese and Russian languages as working languages of the Madrid system.

MARQUES submitted a paper on these topics prepared by the International Trade Mark Law & Practice team, which advocates for improvements to the system from the perspective of brand owners.

MARQUES also contributed to a joint paper regarding provisional refusals, urging that the date of the deadline to respond to a provisional refusal be clearly stated on the communication from the International Bureau of WIPO to the holder of the IR. This joint paper was also signed by CITMA, AIM, ECTA and APRAM.

This is an important topic for brand owners as it is key to have clarity over not only how a deadline to respond to a provisional refusal is calculated, but also the specific date by which a response must be submitted or the holder risks losing their right.

During the meeting, the Working Group agreed that partial replacement should be implemented into the system, which will allow brand owners the option to use replacement to streamline the management of their trade mark portfolios.

Report provided by Jessica Le Gros, Co-Chair of the Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 09.43
Tags: Madrid System, ITMLP Team, WIPO,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA4925
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox