Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 12 OCTOBER 2010
Battle of Mariefred leaves both sides free to use 'Gripsholm'
In a recent Swedish dispute, The Gripsholm Inn AB v The Swedish Red Cross (Case T 9378-09), the Svea Court of Appeal, Stockholm, ruled that the Swedish Red Cross infringed neither the trade mark nor the business name of Gripsholm Inn AB when it used the mark GRIPSHOLMSVIKEN HOTEL & CONFERENCE.

The Gripsholm Inn -- said to be the oldest inn in Sweden -- ran a hotel, restaurant and conference business in the small town of Mariefred, Sweden, having used its name since 1609. In 2006 the Swedish Red Cross, a non-profit organisation, started a hotel and conference business under the name Gripsholmsviken Hotel & Conference, from premises that were only about 1,000 metres from The Gripsholm Inn.  According to The Gripsholm Inn, the Red Cross infringed its exclusive rights in the trade mark GRIPSHOLMS which it had established through use under the Swedish Trade Mark Act.

The Stockholm District Court ruled in favour of the Red Cross and, holding that the name 'Gripsholms' lacked the required distinctiveness to function as a trade mark, there being over 30 other company names which contained the names Gripsholm or Gripsholms. The court added that the marketing surveys in support of the inn's action did not show that the name Gripsholms itself was known in connection with the services provided by the Gripsholm Inn. Nor, it seems, did former employees of the Gripsholm Inn use the name Gripsholms on its own, but referred to 'the Gripsholm Inn' or merely 'the Inn'. Accordingly the mark GRIPSHOLMS had not been established through use with regard to the services provided by the Gripsholm Inn and there could be no trade mark infringement. Further, it could not be said that the Swedish Red Cross infringed the inn's company name, there being no risk of confusion between the parties' respective company names.

The Svea Court of Appeal affirmed this decision on appeal and a subsequent application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court has been withdrawn. 

Source: Tom Kronhöffer and Linda Petersson (MAQS Law Firm, Stockholm), writing for World Trademark Review.
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 08.46
Tags: Sweden, trade mark protected through use,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2052
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox