Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 8 NOVEMBER 2010
France: fraudulent trade mark filing
When the manager of a company files a trade mark application identical to the name of said company, is such application fraudulent?

The Paris Court of Appeal gave a positive answer to this question, in a decision issued on 4 November 2010 which was recently mentioned in Le Journal du Dimanche (6 Nov. 2010).

Back in 1993, Eric Naulleau created a non profit organisation in order to promote literature from European countries located on peninsulas. Said association was named "L'Esprit Des Péninsules" (a word for for translation could be: the spirit of peninsulas). According to the website Bibliomonde, the expression was penned by Bulgarian writer Yordan Radichkov, in a speech he made in Sofia, when trying to explain why is work was more popular in Scandinavian countries.

Then in 1998, together with Rodrigo de Zayas, Naulleau, launched a book-publishing company, also named L'Esprit Des Péninsules. While de Zayas had the majority of shares, Naulleau managed the company. In 2007, the company went bankrupt. A dispute started as it turned out that in 2003, Naulleau had filed a trademark application in classes 16, 35 and 41 for L'Esprit Des Péninsules. The mark was registered in his own name. The INPI database mentions that the mark was transferred to BARDOLLE GAWSEWITCH & NAULLEAU EDITEURS; the recordal date for such transfer of ownership is May 2008.

The liquidator of the company L'Esprit Des Péninsules sued Naulleau in April 2008, arguing that the trade mark had been filed fraudulently and should indeed be considered as an asset of the company. A first instance judgment issued in June 2009 ruled that Naulleau had not fraudulently filed the trade mark, since he "only protected his own creation, which he freely allowed the company to use".While the text of the appeal decision is not yet publicly available, it transpires from the article of Le Journal du Dimanche that the first instance decision was invalidated. The appeal court considered that the mark belonged to the company. Mr Nalleau declared he was considering bringing this case before the Supreme Court.

Posted by: Frédéric Glaize @ 14.31
Tags: fraud, France,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA2092
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox