Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
Chinese court favours online filing
On 25 June, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (BIPC) advocated that relevant parties prioritise the filing of electronic litigation materials online relating to appeals against trade mark rejections and accelerating civil lawsuits.
E-filing does not apply to other types of lawsuits for the time being, as Haoyu Feng and Tingxi Huo report.
Where the lawsuits need to be filed on site, the BIPC advocates submission in the form of compact disks. Where only paper materials are available, the BIPC will assist the parties in turning the materials into electronic files and keep only the necessary paper originals.
Where the lawsuits need to be filed via mail, except for the necessary paper originals, other litigation materials should be filed in the form of compact disks and the electronic materials should be consistent with the paper materials.
Where additional materials need to be submitted late, the BIPC advocates filing in PDF form and will provide assistance on site if required.
Transition period
The mechanism is undergoing a transitional period from 25 June until 15 July 2023. The BIPC welcomes any feedback and suggestions during this period.
After the transition, the relevant parties should strictly follow the BIPC Guidelines for Filing Electronic Litigation Materials in Appeal Against Trademark Rejection (Trial), which the BIPC simultaneously released to specify the technical requirements, rules and effect.
Formalities still required
After a period of experiment, the BIPC has officially put e-filing into practice, though it applies to two types of cases only.
For international parties who need to spend more time and resources on notarisation, legalisation, and authorised translation, e-filing will be more convenient, but this does not mean the parties can be exempted from the time- and resource-consuming notarisation, legalisation or authorised translation.
By Ms Haoyu Feng and Mr Tingxi Huo. The authors are members of Chofn IP and Tingxi Huo is a member of the MARQUES China Team
Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 16.28Tags: BIPC, China, online filing,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA5195

