Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
MONDAY, 3 JULY 2023
Chinese court favours online filing

On 25 June, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (BIPC) advocated that relevant parties prioritise the filing of electronic litigation materials online relating to appeals against trade mark rejections and accelerating civil lawsuits.

E-filing does not apply to other types of lawsuits for the time being, as Haoyu Feng and Tingxi Huo report.

Where the lawsuits need to be filed on site, the BIPC advocates submission in the form of compact disks. Where only paper materials are available, the BIPC will assist the parties in turning the materials into electronic files and keep only the necessary paper originals.

Where the lawsuits need to be filed via mail, except for the necessary paper originals, other litigation materials should be filed in the form of compact disks and the electronic materials should be consistent with the paper materials.

Where additional materials need to be submitted late, the BIPC advocates filing in PDF form and will provide assistance on site if required.

Transition period

The mechanism is undergoing a transitional period from 25 June until 15 July 2023. The BIPC welcomes any feedback and suggestions during this period.

After the transition, the relevant parties should strictly follow the BIPC Guidelines for Filing Electronic Litigation Materials in Appeal Against Trademark Rejection (Trial), which the BIPC simultaneously released to specify the technical requirements, rules and effect.

Formalities still required

After a period of experiment, the BIPC has officially put e-filing into practice, though it applies to two types of cases only.

For international parties who need to spend more time and resources on notarisation, legalisation, and authorised translation, e-filing will be more convenient, but this does not mean the parties can be exempted from the time- and resource-consuming notarisation, legalisation or authorised translation.

By Ms Haoyu Feng and Mr Tingxi Huo. The authors are members of Chofn IP and Tingxi Huo is a member of the MARQUES China Team

Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 16.28
Tags: BIPC, China, online filing,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA5195
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox