CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
WEDNESDAY, 8 JULY 2009
CFI eats Mars' chocolate bar trademark
The evidence submitted by Mars was insufficient to prove that the mark had acquired distinctiveness through use in the part of the Community in which it had not ab initio had such distinctiveness. Appeal dismissed. Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 13.24
Tags: absolute grounds for refusal, acquired distinctiveness, CFI, chocolate, mars,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1243
CFI eats Mars' chocolate bar trademark
In 2003, the shape depicted on the left was registered for, among others, chocolate snacks, as a CTM. A competitor filed for nullity of the 3D mark. The OHIM dismissed the action, but on appeal, the 2nd Board of Appeal of OHIM reversed and cancelled the registration. In its judgment of 7 July, the CFI dismissed Mars' appeal against the decision.
The CFI held that the elongated form of the bar was, as the term "chocolate bar" suggests, rather typical for chocolate bars. It would not be perceived as indication of source. As to the "chevron" markings on top:
Lastly, as regards the three chevrons on the top of the shape at issue, it must be held that the Board of Appeal was correct to find, in paragraph 26 of the contested decision, that the average consumer of the category of goods concerned will perceive those chevrons, at the most, as decorative elements and not as a sign indicating the commercial origin of the product. The applicant has not established that the relevant consumer would pay particular attention to that characteristic or to the rounded ends to the point of perceiving them as an indication of the commercial origin of the product concerned.
The evidence submitted by Mars was insufficient to prove that the mark had acquired distinctiveness through use in the part of the Community in which it had not ab initio had such distinctiveness. Appeal dismissed. Posted by: Mark Schweizer @ 13.24
Tags: absolute grounds for refusal, acquired distinctiveness, CFI, chocolate, mars,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA1243
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive