CLASS 46
Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.
Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
MONDAY, 7 APRIL 2008
Some additional thoughts on the "Windsor Estate" decision
Posted by: Birgit Clark @ 12.06
Tags: Bundesgerichtshof, German trade marks, windsor estate,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA331
Some additional thoughts on the "Windsor Estate" decision
Further to Jeremy's post below, some additional thoughts on the Bundesgerichtshof's Windsor Estate decision. The Windsor Estate decision [BGH I. Zivilsenat 93/04] has been widely discussed in Germany and has been seen to have further consequences.
In its newsletter of March 2008 (please click here: in German, in English), law firm IP24 draws another interesting conclusion from this decision. IP24 explains that, following the Windsor Estate decision, the owner of an older trade mark may claim damages and obtain an injunction against the applicant of a more recent trade mark from two weeks after publication of the registration of the new trade mark. In the Windsor Estate decision the Federal Supreme Court has now stated that a trade mark search is compulsory prior to the filing of an application or using the mark on further goods and/or services. IP24 further explains that a search will not only have to cover older trade marks but must also include older company names, magazines, book and film titles as well as domain names. Holders of trade marks will thus not only be able to file an opposition but may also be able to claim damages due to the registration of the trade mark.
Tags: Bundesgerichtshof, German trade marks, windsor estate,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA331
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 46 Archive