Log in

CLASS 46


Now in its twelfth year, Class 46 is dedicated to European trade mark law and practice. This weblog is written by a team of enthusiasts who want to spread the word and share their thoughts with others.

Want to receive Class 46 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.

Who we all are...
Anthonia Ghalamkarizadeh
Birgit Clark
Blog Administrator
Christian Tenkhoff
Fidel Porcuna
Gino Van Roeyen
Markku Tuominen
Niamh Hall
Nikos Prentoulis
Stefan Schröter
Tomasz Rychlicki
Yvonne Onomor
TUESDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 2008
Poland: Lindt's problems with Polish bunnies



The Polish newspaper Gazeta Prawna reports (this article is available courtesy of Polish Patent Office's press reviews of daily articles devoted to IP rights) recent judgment of the Polish Supreme Court (act signature I CSK 96/08) of 3 October 2008 regarding dispute between Lindt & Sprüngli from Switzerland and Polish company TERRAVITA Sp. z o.o. from Poznan.

Terravita Easter bunnies The Supreme Court held that chocolate Easter bunnies which are produced on the same matrices but are manufactured by two competing firms are only similar in shape. Other elements vary considerably which, in consequence, results in no likelihood of customer confusion as to the origin of goods.

According to Gazeta Prawna the Court ruled that, although there are similarities in the bunnies' shapes (that because the Polish company bought matrices from Swiss company), the gold packages of those two products differ significantly because one has a darker hue, the other a brighter shade. Polish bunnies do not have bells and their bows are painted. According to the Supreme Court there is also a significant difference in price, the Polish product being cheaper. The Court has also confirmed the findings of a lower court that the only distinctive element apart from the shape is the name of the manufacturer. Therefore there is no likelihood of customer confusion as to the origin of goods.

Class 46 will return to commenting on this judgment once the Court publishes its justification which, according to the Court's rules, should last 30 days plus administrative actions (signatures, editing etc.).

Posted by: Tomasz Rychlicki @ 10.24
Tags: Famous marks, Poland, Polish Supreme Court, Polish trade marks, trade mark infringement,
Sharing on Social Media? Use the link below...
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class46?XID=BHA801
Reader Comments: 0
Post a Comment


MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.


The Class 46 Archive






 

 

 

 

 

 


CONTACT

info@marques.org
+44 (0)116 2747355
POST ADDRESS

9 Cartwright Court, Cartwright Way
Bardon, Leicestershire
LE67 1UE

EMAIL

Ingrid de Groot
Internal Relations Officer
ingrid.de.groot@marques.org
Alessandra Romeo
External Relations Officer
aromeo@marques.org
James Nurton
Newsletter Editor
editor@marques.org
Robert Harrison
Webmaster
robertharrison@marques.org
BLOGS

Signup for our blogs.
Headlines delivered to your inbox