CLASS 99
The blog for design law, in Europe and worldwide. This weblog is written by a team of design experts and fans. To contribute, or join us, or for any other reason, email class99@marques.org.
Want to receive Class 99 by email?
Click here subscribe for free.
Click here subscribe for free.
Who we all are...
THURSDAY, 30 DECEMBER 2010
Spain refers two design infringement questions to Court of Justice
Posted on Curia recently was news of another reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling -- this time from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante, which is Spain's Community Design Court. This is Case C-488/10 Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L. The questions referred for a ruling are as follows:
Tags: reference for a preliminary ruling to the ECJ,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA195
Spain refers two design infringement questions to Court of Justice
Posted on Curia recently was news of another reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling -- this time from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil No 1 de Alicante, which is Spain's Community Design Court. This is Case C-488/10 Celaya Emparanza y Galdos Internacional S.A. v Proyectos Integrales de Balizamientos S.L. The questions referred for a ruling are as follows:
"In proceedings for infringement of the exclusive right conferred by a registered Community design, does the right to prevent the use thereof by third parties provided for in Article 19(1) of Council Regulation ... 6/20021 ... on Community designs extend to any third party who uses another design that does not produce on informed users a different overall impression or, on the contrary, is a third party who uses a subsequent Community design registered in his name excluded until such time as that design is declared invalid?This weblog would be delighted to hear from any informed reader as to what is the factual background of this reference. Posted by: Blog Administrator @ 09.43
Is the answer to the first question unconnected with the intention of the third party or does it depend on his conduct, a decisive point being whether the third party applied for and registered the later Community design after receiving an extra-judicial demand from the proprietor of the earlier Community design calling on him to cease marketing the product on the ground that it infringes rights deriving from that earlier design?"
Tags: reference for a preliminary ruling to the ECJ,
Perm-A-Link: https://www.marques.org/blogs/class99?XID=BHA195
MARQUES does not guarantee the accuracy of the information in this blog. The views are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of MARQUES. Seek professional advice before action on any information included here.
The Class 99 Archive
